Walter K. acorn lighted castle with his interesting article “loans crash” once and for all investors important issue. Namely, the question is are we now on a hyperinflation or to prepare for a deflationary collapse. Unfortunately he can with a clear too, as both its readers, I believe, ultimately uncertain.
If Eichel castle on the final writes: “I was also asked whether it is not like gold and buy on credit, a leverage effect. Likely climb well, but I recommend it anyway.” So asks the reader rightly - that is what now?
Eichel castle even writes: “In a situation like now, you should have no credits have run. Only I can recommend to all readers, their loans repaid and, if necessary, house / apartment for sale, and in the meantime to rent.” He justified this with sentences such as: “In a nonlinear mixture of deflation and hyperinflation, every credit pure poison. In any kind of economic crisis should be no loans running.”
The reasons, it points to the writings of Günter Hannich and Eberhard Hamer and Eike, like other prophets crash also a deflationary collapse first, and then expect a hyperinflation. In this case, it is obviously useful to begin to entschulden and cash bunkern, as, for example, it Hannich and Paul C. Martin recommend because cash in deflationary collapse is always valuable. But is a process, as it acorn castle as follows describes any plausible?
Summary of the process:
* 1 Level: sell the dollar and then the other currencies, with interest explosion
* 2 Level: Massenbankrotte including Staatsbankrotte
* 3 Level: Euro breaks, states begin to monetise massively, hyperinflation
* 4 Level: stabilization crisis, new currency is introduced
After this sequence, ie until the deflationary collapse and then the hyperinflation, Presentation after the crash prophets, the State has only one payment, then the audience is flooded with money, and then somehow in a kind of “crisis stabilization” finally a new currency. Eichel Burg writes: “Vorrübergehend the states then (in Stage 2) at least become insolvent, civil servants’ salaries and pensions and social benefits are reduced or not paid for a long time. Subsequently, at least some countries of the euro and erupt into a spiral hyperinflationäre occur.”
Somehow purzelt because of the logic of her somewhat confused, and you have the feeling that it may not be correct. I think exactly the opposite, it is a shoe. First comes the hyperinflation and a currency reform. The debt will not exceed the deflationary collapse booked, but on the hyperinflation. In this case, it makes sense to get into debt. I want to try this position shortly to explain.
Eichel castle is right on the huge global debt. A phenomenon that in this way it never has, so the orientation of past operations (hyperinflation 1923, deflation 1933 ff) easily be misled. Of the crash prophet is usually the preferred option deflationary with 1933 as a model. At the time came, in fact, the money supply, the prices fell, money value rose and the world economy broke. In such a scenario, of course, is a poison debt, because the purchasing power of money and thus increasing the debt more pressing and more difficult to operate. It must therefore necessarily debt in such a phase.
But such a development is a plausible and probably today? Have we not a completely different situation? 1929/30, when the great depression started, we had a gold standard. He was already softened, and it had only about 40% gold as cover accused, but there was Einlösepflicht in gold for banknotes. As the Bankrun einsetzte 1933, the people wanted to collect their gold and the stock was quickly exhausted. Roosevelt then the banks closed and announced bekäme all his money (paper), when the banks reopen, private possession of gold, however, was prohibited. People have got to this trick, and were pleased that the banks have again aufmachten and they came to their money.
Many banks and businesses went bankrupt in 1929 after the inflated loan money (not the gold money) shrank dramatically. This occurred in the history of money an extremely rare case that the remaining money, which is still officially was covered with gold, always valuable. It also made sense to bunkern money, loans were fatal.
We have no gold but today cover more. State and banks can now generate any amount of money. The great error of the crash prophets is that they somehow still the gold standard from 1930 in the head, that they believe the money was still somewhat limited in his State officials could no longer afford to pay, because the money from him. But this case will now certainly not occur. It has not worked 200 years, from the precious metal to free captive to now this freedom not to do so. For about 35 years, is no more currency in the world of gold or anything else. This is a completely new experiment that has never been given before, which is why we made the 30s also no meaningful conclusions.
Since the abolition of the gold binding state and banks can be any debt and both together can play any amounts of money. The market value of houses is in the major economies in the years 2000 - 2005 by some 30 trillion to 70 trillion increase in the market capitalization of shares in the global stock markets has improved in that time already doubled from 20 to about 40 trillion dollars, because the money has increased immensely.
Why should these values are not going to double over the next 5 years, with a corresponding gain (imaginary), which then also can be loaned. Inflation is creeping poison a halt, for a long time until very pleasant effect. Rising share prices and houses are not considered inflation, but as a pleasant prosperity perceived increase, the additional debt.
Mr. Hannich and Debitisten are always mistakenly by a repayment of the debt. That must not happen naturally. How acorn Castle rightly writes, it is anyway no longer possible. The savings rhetoric of our government is extremely misleading. It is not, however, any savings but more of deception in order to preserve the confidence in the value of money
We can but with a large safety be confident that there will be a hyperinflation will come. In this case, it makes sense to debt and property to buy. Gold and silver are particularly suitable because they are likely once again to money, but on the other hand, because they are currently material assets, as opposed to real estate is still extremely undervalued.
Inflation in the last decades of gold and silver gerauscht completely gone. Silver should be somewhere at 25 and gold in 1400, only to offset the effects of inflation. In a hyperinflation can of course gold and silver prices reaching unprecedented and your old debts can then crumbs with a gold repay. It is now more important to keep calm and also by strong price increases are not tempted to let his precious metal against waste paper (fiat money) to sell, as Warren Buffett now with his silver happened. A psychologically good vehicle for this is silver art (www.bullion-art.de), which sells it is not as fast.
In order to do an acorn Castle virtually off-times to answer. When in 2001, e.g. Silver for 100,000 euros and has purchased an additional 100,000 euros for further silver on credit in dollars by the whole silver for the dollar has pledged credit, it has now practical for silver and 400,000 euros of credit in euros has virtually no cost, on the contrary , it now owes less than in Euro 2001 in the form of dollars were borrowed. It was also useful to silver to buy on credit.
The crash prophets have also had been strongly warned before loans. Of course it increases with the credit not only the opportunities but also the risks. The Hunts have lost all their assets because they bought silver on credit and not have expected that Paul Volker interest increased to 20% to the dollar to save. Bernanke also could make. How likely that is, everyone must decide.
Source: http://www.goldseiten.de/content/diverses/artikel.php?storyid=2638